building tradespeople: are they understood by AI assistants?
Comprehension score by AI assistants of building tradespeople sites, city by city. Data as of November 3, 2026 : 190 sites analysed, average score 79/100.
| City | Sites | Average score | Below 50/100 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto | 18 | 88/100 | 0 % |
| Vancouver | 12 | 86/100 | 0 % |
| Londres | 66 | 73/100 | 17 % |
| Cork | 11 | 76/100 | 0 % |
| Dublin | 6 | 78/100 | 0 % |
| Austin | 27 | 78/100 | 11 % |
| Miami | 26 | 83/100 | 4 % |
| San Diego | 24 | 83/100 | 4 % |
Method: each site is read automatically, without human judgement, and scored on what an AI assistant can understand (activity, location, hours, prices, reviews, contact). A score below 50 means an assistant is likely not to recommend this professional.
Audit my site
In 30 seconds, a free score and three clear findings in plain English. Then, if you wish, an action plan of up to 7 prioritised steps.
Free score · Action plan 29 € Test my site for freeRebuild my site
Give us your name and your Google listing or your site. We build your new site and send it by email: you look, you decide.
Demo built, free, no obligation Get my free demo